For each assessment type, explain whether you think it is informal, formal, or both; then explain if you think it is formative, summative or both; then criterion-referenced, norm-referenced, or both. (Hint: your answer will often be it depends, but you'll need to explain). Then, for each assessment type, explain how valid, reliable, fair, and practical it is.
Assessment Types:
Observations:
Informative because the teacher should be observing the students individually. Not all students may grasp each concept. This type of assessment is a formative assessment due to the fact that the teacher should be observing her/his students on a regular basis. This type of assessment will help the teacher tailor the next lesson to what the students have learned and what they still need work on. Not only that, but as mentioned earlier this ongoing assessment will help the teacher to see which of the concepts individual students are comprehending. As far as to whether this type of assessment is a criterion-referenced or norm-referenced assessments I think that the Observation assessment could fall under both categories of reference assessments. On one hand the Criterion-Reference assessment is relevant because not all students learn at the same speed and its important for the teacher to know where each of her/his students are at and what can be done to help them improve. Yet on the other hand the Norm-Referenced assessment can show the teacher where the student is at compared to the other students in the class and what needs to be done to helps the students catch up if they are behind and if they are so far ahead the teacher can do whatever is necessary to help the student keep that momentum and maybe move the student to a more advanced class. Observation is a very important tool that teacher need to be using all throughout the semesters.
- Reliability: This assessment will give the teacher a good idea of where each student is. However the results may not be consistent because the teacher may not be able to see the progress a student is making or has made when the teacher was not observing them.
- Fairness: This is where the teacher can assess each students individual. However, this kind of assessment leaves a lot of room for bias. The teacher could give a student a good grade, even if the student didn't meet all the requirements, simple because the teacher liked the student.
- Validity: This assessment should be aligned with what is being taught in the unit.
- Practicality: This kind of assessment doesn't take extra time after school and grading is minimal since it is an observation.
Self-assessments:
I think that that the Self-assessment is an example of both informal and formal assessments depending on when it is used in a unit. For example, a teacher can use this as an informal assessment periodically throughout the semester to gage where the student is at, what they feel there strengths and weaknesses are and what they can do to improve throughout the remainder of the semester. This is also helpful for the teacher because it is feedback and can help the teacher better tailor his/her lesson plans more appropriately. Then on the other hand it can be used as a formal assessment after a test or a project. This can further show what the student feels they have learned in the unit. This a great way for the student to explain why they feel they should have been graded differently. Sometimes a student can better explain themselves rather then answer multiple-answer test questions. This kind of assessment can be used as both a formative and a summative assessment for the same reasons it can be used as an informal and formal assessment, in my opinion. This type of assessment would work best as a criterion-referenced assessment. This is where the student has the opportunity to explain themselves. There is not really a comparison that is necessary.
- Reliability: The self assessment provides an inner-observer reliability between the teacher and the student. The student will critically evaluate their progress and the teacher can combine that evaluation with their own observance. However, this kind of assessment may not track the students' actual progress. It simply shows where the student feels they are.
- Fairness: Each student will have the same opportunity to assess themselves concerning their own progress. They will have a voice in their grade.
- Validity: This activity may have content validity. It will help students measure their knowledge of a unit, including what areas they understand. However, students may be dishonest by not providing an accurate self-assessment of what they have done thus far in the unit and how hard they are actually working.
- Practicality: This assessment is very easy to grade since there is a right or wrong answer to person's self assessment.
Peer-assessments:
I think that this type of assessment can be both a formal and an informal assessment. For example this can be used as a formal assessment at the end of a group project to assess the participation of each member in a group. It can also be used as an informal assessment throughout the unit when students are writing research papers or working on other papers or projects that the students are working on, they can pass it to their peers for peer-review/peer-assessment. I think that this type of assessment would be best used as a summative assessment. This is the place that the students can describe, from their perspective what went on during group projects preparation and who did what work. The students are usually given guidelines of what to assess their peers on and they are given space to express concern if a student in their group was not participating. The teacher is not able to be around every time a group meets for a group project.
- Reliability: The rubric that will be given is clear and consistent with the subject. Each student's rubric is the same format and has the same questions. However, the results may not be consistent because the teacher may not be able to see the true progress of a student's work. This form of assessment is based on what the other students in the group feel. Rubrics given to the students may be consistent but the responses from the students will vary and there could be some inaccuracies due to biases.
- Fairness: Students have an opportunity to rate each other fairly by sticking to a grading rubric given to them. They will grade each other on a controlled grading chart. This type of assessment may not be very fair because there can be biases involved. If a student does not like another then that student can simply give the other student a zero.
- Validity: The peer assessment is intended to assess whether each student is actively participating in the project. It helps the teacher see what and who is really participating when the teacher is not actually able to be with every group at all times.
- Practicality: This gives the student free reign to express where they felt actual participation lies. There may have been a student that was not willing to help with the project and with this form of assessment it is a practical way for the other students in the group their concerns about who deserves what grade.
Projects:
Projects are informal way to assess that the students are grasping the concepts that they are learning in class and are able to apply them. This type of assessment can be used as either a formative or a summative assessment. I think that a project is more of an example of a summative assessment since projects are usually on a larger scale and require more work and time and encompasses more then one concept. The project can be used as both criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessment. For example the projects that are done individually should be judge individually based on the predetermined criteria yet on the other hand projects that are done in groups, having the final group presentations compared to the other groups presentations may be necessary to judge whether the students as a whole are grasping the concepts that are being taught.
- Reliability: If the project is done consistently what the unit and is clearly stated and laided out for what is expected for each student and/or group then this would be a reliable assessments. However, if some specifics are left up to the students to create presentations with no limits on what they can put in there presentations, some groups may go off on tangents and not cover the subjected asked to cover.
- Fairness: This kind of assessment is a different way for students to express what they have learned. Not all students can take tests well and some can not write papers well but they have the opportunity to express their creative side.
- Validity: Each student is being graded on how well they know the information they are presenting.
- Practicality: When projects are done in groups it cuts down on the amount of projects the teacher has to grade. However, groups might not take advantage of the time given in class and student will spend a lot of tine researching and writing and/or preparing and presenting oral presentations.
Performances:
I think that Performance assessments are more informal and are given throughout the until so they would be formative assessments. This is because the purpose of the performance assessment is to get the students to use the skills they are learning in somewhat of a real life setting. This assessment is a criterion-referenced assessment. It is important that the teacher knows that the students individually are grasping the concepts that are being taught. This is something that, for the most part should be judged/graded on an individual bases.
- Reliability: What is being expected of the students will be stated and laid out clearly.
- Fairness: Every student will have the same access to he school materials and library. Students may be allowed class time to work on this project. However, not all students will have the same access to materials at home.
- Validity: This type of assessment is aligned with the information student will be learning in class. The students will take the information that they have learned in class and apply it.
- Practicality: Students will not only work on this performance assessment during class, but also at home, giving the teacher more time to lecture. However, this assignment could take some students longer then others to finish.
Portfolios:
This is a formal assessment and should be a summative assessment as well. This is where the teacher as well as the student can see first hand what progress has been made. The teacher can also assign reflections, where the student can have a chance to explain why maybe they did bad or good on some assignments. But in all it's a chance to take a look at the over-all progress, whether good or bad, that the student had made. This could be both a criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessment. The student should be judged individual for hi/her progress based on the assignments that are required to be turned in. It is also a good teacher tool to get the students to take responsibility for saving assignments that are of significant. This assessment can be a norm-referenced assessment because assignments can be compared to others in the class and maybe all students did poorly on a particular assignment and the teacher can either make that assignment worth less points and then raising everyone's score in the class but also its an opportunity for the teacher to be able to modify his/her lesson plans for future classes.
- Reliability: Each student is in charge of their own reflections, so they are able to reflect on their own work.
- Fairness: Students have and equal opportunity to reflect on how they feel about the content, what they have learned and also have the opportunity to redo assignments that they did poorly on in the past concerning the unit. However, some students my have done what they think is their best, but the teacher does not believe it is their best work.
- Validity: The portfolio is valid because it is aligned with the core standards and the assessments they have done throughout the unit.
- Practicality: The portfolio will be easy o implement into a unit and parts of the portfolio will not take the student a long time to complete. However, the portfolios may take a long time to grade.
Tests:
"Test" is such a broad term. There are so many different kinds of tests that can be administered. They can be both formal and informal, formative an summative. The purpose f the test is to determine what the students are learning and what they still need hep leaning. The different kinds of tests throughout the unit will not only benefit the student but the teacher as well. It will give the teacher the knowledge he/she will need to know to better accommodate his/her student's learning patterns and to help try his/her very best to help all the students succeed. This type of assessment can be both criterion-referenced and norm referenced assessments. Its important to see where each student is individually but its also imperative that the teacher knows where his/her students are as a whole, that way he/she can go back and review things/concepts that the students need extra work on.
- Reliability: Test students on the knowledge they actually learned. However, some students may have missed lectures and were not able to get the notes necessary to properly study for tests.
- Fairness: Covers so many different areas and different models of testing (i.e. matching, multiple choice, essay) which will give the student a better chance of doing well in some areas as opposed to others. However, not all students respond to tests the same way.
- Validity: Each student is given the same tests and graded the same.
- Practicality: Tests can be easy to grade if the answer key is already made. However, essay questions can be hard to grade it can be so objective based on how the students retain information.